Active
Active litigation
Court unknown
· No. 11
Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley issued a minute order on May 12, 2026, appointing Attorney Lina Baroudi as counsel for the petitioner nunc pro tunc to that date. The court directed the clerk to update the docket to reflect this appointment on an ad hoc basis. The order confirms counsel's contact information as required by a prior court order.
1 event
0 coverage signals
Active
Active litigation
S.D.N.Y.
· 26-cv-02736
Jessica Badenoch filed a civil lawsuit against Riedell Shoes, Inc. and others in the Southern District of New York, docket number 26-cv-02736. The case was reassigned following a judge’s self-recusal, which may affect scheduling and judicial oversight.
5 events
5 coverage signals
Active
Active litigation
Court unknown
Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan appointed attorney Adilene Flores-Estrada pro hac vice as CJA counsel for a petitioner in the Eastern District of California. The appointment was made nunc pro tunc to January 13, 2026, confirming counsel's authority to represent the petitioner under General Order 582.
1 event
0 coverage signals
Active
Active litigation
C.D. Cal.
· 26-cv-01641
Pablo de la Cruz Tepaz Ibanez sued Todd Lyons in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-01641. The docket shows counsel appearance or withdrawal, indicating representation changes without substantive updates on the dispute.
4 events
4 coverage signals
Active
Active litigation
S.D.N.Y.
· 25-cv-00930
Sgaggio et al v. Deback et al is a civil case. The court has granted an extension of time to one of the parties in the case. The extension was issued on docket number 25-cv-00930. The case is ongoing, and no further information is available at this time. The court's order granting the extension suggests that the case is progressing, but the outcome is still
3 events
3 coverage signals
Active
Active litigation
Court unknown
Freeman v. Law Office of J. Xavier Pryor LLC appears to be a published opinion, but no court, docket number, date, or substantive case details are available in the source record. The case title suggests a dispute involving a law firm as a named defendant, which may point to a legal malpractice, debt collection, or consumer protection claim. No facts
1 event
0 coverage signals
Active
Active litigation
W.D. Wash.
· 25-cv-00939
The parties in the case of Hill, Jr., et al., v. Law Office of Jonathan C Frank & Associates, PLLC have filed a status report. The report is 15 pages long. This development suggests that the parties are actively working on the case and are providing the court with regular updates. The status report may provide insight into the case's progress and the
2 events
2 coverage signals