Regisford v. Lockamy

description

Case Summary

Regisford v. Lockamy is a case with a docket number of 23-cv-05928. The defendant has filed a reply memorandum of law in support of their motion, but the details of the motion are not specified. This may indicate that the defendant is trying to address a specific issue or that they are trying to delay the case.

Latest development

1:23-cv-05928 Regisford v. Lockamy

Motion · April 22, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

• • Docket number 23-cv-05928
• • Defendant's motion
• • Reply memorandum of law

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:23-cv-05928 M. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Other · Apr 27, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

5 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Uber Technologies, Inc, 1:23-cv-05928 Regisford and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 13 hours, 36 minutes ago

Regisford v. Lockamy is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 23-cv-05928.

The dispute currently identifies 1:23-cv-05928 Regisford on one side and Uber Technologies, Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Docket number 23-cv-05928, Defendant's motion, Reply memorandum of law.

Lockamy is a case with a docket number of 23-cv-05928. The defendant has filed a reply memorandum of law in support of their motion, but the details of the motion are not specified. This may indicate that the defendant is trying to address a specific issue or that they are trying to delay the case.

On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Change of Address was filed. On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: A Motion was filed.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Case Timeline

2 events

info

Other April 27, 2026

3:23-cv-05928 M. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

A Notice of Change of Address was filed.

description View filing open_in_new

edit_note

Motion April 22, 2026

1:23-cv-05928 Regisford v. Lockamy

A Motion was filed.

description View filing open_in_new

show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles

All No paywall (2) Original reporting (2)

newspaper

Coverage

3:23-cv-05928 M. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Notice of Change of Address ( 16

Apr 27, 2026 · 1 min read

newspaper

Coverage

1:23-cv-05928 Regisford v. Lockamy

Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion ( 211

Apr 22, 2026 · 1 min read