legal-news

REGENXBIO Inc. et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al.

20-cv-01226 D. Del.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court issued a USCA Mandate in the case of REGENXBIO Inc. et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al. The case number is 20-cv-01226. the details of the mandate are not provided.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • USCA Mandate
  • REGENXBIO Inc. et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Del.

District of Delaware · 3rd Circuit · DE

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:20-cv-01226 REGENXBIO Inc. et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al.

Other · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Delaware, a federal district court in DE.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc, 1:20-cv-01226 REGENXBIO Inc and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

District of Delaware (D. Del.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, DE.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 29, 2026

1:20-cv-01226 REGENXBIO Inc. et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has issued a mandate in the case of REGENXBIO Inc. et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al. (1:20-cv-01226). This mandate indicates that the appeals court has completed its review of the case and is returning it to the lower court for further action. The mandate is a procedural step that allows the case to move forward.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 3 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.