legal-news

Rearden LLC and TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp. Engage in Motion Hearing

22-cv-02464 N.D. Cal.
Active Motion practice Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active. Latest development: 4:22-cv-02464 Rearden LLC et al v. TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp. et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.

Latest development

4:22-cv-02464 Rearden LLC et al v. TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp. et al

Motion · April 30, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Motion practice

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

4:22-cv-02464 Rearden LLC et al v. TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp. et al

Motion · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp, 4:22-cv-02464 Rearden LLC and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
edit_note
Motion April 30, 2026

4:22-cv-02464 Rearden LLC et al v. TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp. et al

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 10 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.