2:25-cv-00984 Privakey, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Withdraw as Attorney ( 51
Cisco Systems, Inc. has withdrawn its attorney from the case Privakey, Inc. v. (2:25-cv-00984). This change in representation may impact the case's progress and strategy. The withdrawal of an attorney can be a significant development in a lawsuit.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Cisco Systems, Inc. has withdrawn its attorney from the case Privakey, Inc. v. (2:25-cv-00984). This change in representation may impact the case's progress and strategy. The withdrawal of an attorney can be a significant development in a lawsuit.
Cisco Systems, Inc. is a defendant in a separate lawsuit, 2:25-cv-00591 Diorite Technology, LLC v. This case is unrelated to Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. v. but involves Cisco as a defendant.
Cisco Systems, Inc. is a defendant in a separate lawsuit, Damaka, Inc. v. (2:25-cv-00593), which is unrelated to Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. This separate lawsuit does not impact the Ramot case.
Cisco Systems, Inc. is a defendant in a separate lawsuit, 2:22-cv-00166, filed by Zilkr Cloud Technologies, LLC. This case is unrelated to Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.'s case against Cisco. The filing indicates Cisco's involvement in another legal matter.
A new case, Lionra Technologies Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., was filed in the Eastern District of Texas, potentially affecting the ongoing patent dispute between Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. and Cisco Systems, Inc. This new case may complicate the existing litigation and impact the outcome. The exact nature of the dispute is unclear at this time.
Cisco Systems, Inc. was sued by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. in the Eastern District of Texas for allegedly infringing on a patent related to network security. The case, 2:19-cv-00225, was filed on January 28, 2019. The lawsuit seeks damages and an injunction to stop Cisco's alleged infringement.
Withdraw as Attorney ( 51
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 6 articles
Timeline events
6 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 23 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.