1:24-cv-07656 S.A.M. et al v. United States Department of States et al
Endorsed Letter ( 37
PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al is a civil case in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-03800. The court issued an endorsed letter, which typically addresses procedural or substantive issues raised by the parties. This indicates active judicial management of the litigation.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-07656 S.A.M. et al v. United States Department of States et al
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
8 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
5 Defendants, 2 Government Agencys, 3 Plaintiffs
15 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes United States Department of States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, United States Department of State and others.
Press monitoring has found 8 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-03800.
The dispute currently identifies 1:23-cv-02476 OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, 1:25-cv-03800 PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC, and 3:25-cv-07309 The Center for Investigative Reporting on one side and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, and United States Department of Justice on the other.
The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, Agency action and administrative review, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court endorsed a letter in the case 1:24-cv-07656 S.A.M. et al v. United States Department of States et al.
This letter is related to the case PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al. The endorsement indicates.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint status report. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the plaintiff to file a response in the case TOVAR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al, which is related to the case PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC.
This.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
The court endorsed a letter in the case 1:24-cv-07656 S.A.M. et al v. United States Department of States et al. This letter is related to the case PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al. The endorsement indicates that the court has taken notice of the letter.
The parties filed a joint status report.
The court granted an extension of time for the plaintiff to file a response in the case TOVAR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al, which is related to the case PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al. This extension allows the plaintiff more time to prepare their response. The extension is significant because it gives the plaintiff additional time to gather evidence and build their case.
The parties filed a joint status report.
The parties filed a joint status report.
An Amended Complaint was filed.
A Summons was issued.
The court entered judgment.
Endorsed Letter ( 37
Status Report ( 330
Extension of Time to ( 32
Status Report ( 26
Status Report ( 44
Amended Complaint ( 27
Summons Returned Executed as to USA ( 6
Summary Judgment ( 12
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 8 articles
Timeline events
8 records on file
Last updated
20 hours, 47 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.