Pro Hac Vice fee received for attorney Celina B. Curillo
Case Summary
The court received a Pro Hac Vice fee payment for attorney Celina B. Curillo. This fee allows an out-of-state lawyer to participate in a specific case. The payment confirms the attorney's authorized appearance in the jurisdiction.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Pro Hac Vice admission
- • Attorney Celina B. Curillo
- • Fee payment
- • Jurisdictional authorization
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Pro Hac Vice fee received as to CELINA B. CURILLO $ 250, receipt number TRE149042 (kht)
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
Case Timeline
1 eventPro Hac Vice fee received as to CELINA B. CURILLO $ 250, receipt number TRE149042 (kht)
The court received a $250 pro hac vice fee from Celina B. Curillo, allowing her to appear in this case despite not being admitted to the local bar. This payment confirms her temporary admission to practice law in this jurisdiction. It matters because it enables Curillo to represent a party in this case legally.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
13 hours, 8 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.