Prelle challenges judicial appointments in New Jersey federal case
Case Summary
Prelle filed suit against the Chief Executive Officer of New Jersey and others in the District of New Jersey, docket 16-cv-05447. The case references adding and terminating judges, suggesting procedural or administrative disputes involving court personnel or judicial appointments.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Judicial administration
- • Appointment and termination of judges
- • State executive involvement
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:16-cv-05447 PRELLE v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF et al
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
1 event3:16-cv-05447 PRELLE v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF et al
The court updated the case docket by adding and removing judges assigned to PRELLE v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF et al. This change affects which judges will oversee the case moving forward. Such adjustments can influence case management and judicial decisions.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.