PNC Bank sues DD Freight Express in Central District of California civil case
Case Summary
PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to PNC Equipment Finance, LLC v. DD Freight Express, Inc. et al is a civil case with an unknown current summary. The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The docket number is 26-cv-04617.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Unknown Current Summary
- • PNC Bank, National Association
- • Unknown Court
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04617 Santillo et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes DD Freight Express, Inc, 1:26-cv-04617 PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to PNC Equipment and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to PNC Equipment Finance, LLC v. DD Freight Express, Inc. et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-04617.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-04617 PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to PNC Equipment on one side and DD Freight Express, Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Unknown Current Summary, PNC Bank, National Association, Unknown Court.
et al is a civil case with an unknown current summary. The case is currently pending in an unknown court. The docket number is 26-cv-04617.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: PNC Bank, National Association has filed a jury demand in the case against DD Freight Express, Inc. and others. This means that the parties involved are opting for a trial by jury, where a group of citizens will decide the outcome of the case.
The demand was. On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Summons was issued. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted PNC Bank's motion to compel discovery from DD Freight Express, Inc.
and other defendants. This means the defendants must now provide the requested information to PNC Bank. The ruling is significant because it allows PNC Bank to continue its.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
3 events2:26-cv-04617 Santillo et al
PNC Bank, National Association has filed a jury demand in the case against DD Freight Express, Inc. and others. This means that the parties involved are opting for a trial by jury, where a group of citizens will decide the outcome of the case. The demand was filed in the case 2:26-cv-04617 Santillo et al.
1:26-cv-04617 BHATTI v. EDLOW et al
A Summons was issued.
1:26-cv-04617 PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to PNC Equipment Finance, LLC v. DD Freight Express, Inc. et al
The court granted PNC Bank's motion to compel discovery from DD Freight Express, Inc. and other defendants. This means the defendants must now provide the requested information to PNC Bank. The ruling is significant because it allows PNC Bank to continue its lawsuit against the defendants.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
1:26-cv-04617 PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to PNC Equipment Finance, LLC v. DD Freight Express, Inc. et al
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
18 hours, 2 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.