newspaper
legal-news
Pichardo v. F L Moore & Sons, Inc. et al
25-cv-10744
S.D.N.Y.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case Pichardo v. F L Moore & Sons, Inc. et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealed documents will not be publicly available.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-10744 Pichardo v. F L Moore & Sons, Inc. et al
Other · May 01, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes F L Moore & Sons, Inc, 1:25-cv-10744 Pichardo.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
info
Other
May 1, 2026
1:25-cv-10744 Pichardo v. F L Moore & Sons, Inc. et al
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case Pichardo v. F L Moore & Sons, Inc. et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealed documents will not be publicly available.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.