Judge Assigned in Perez-De Armas v. Wardren at Southern District of Florida
Case Summary
The Southern District of Florida clerk assigned a judge to Perez-De Armas v. Wardren. The notice also included an optional consent form for magistrate judge jurisdiction. This administrative action advances the case toward active litigation by establishing judicial oversight.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Judge assignment
- • Optional magistrate consent
- • Litigation commencement
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-23286 Perez-De Armas v. Wardren, Krome North Service Processing Center et al
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Wardren, Krome North Service Processing Center, 1:26-cv-23286 Perez-De Armas.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
Case Timeline
1 event1:26-cv-23286 Perez-De Armas v. Wardren, Krome North Service Processing Center et al
A Notice of Judge Assignment and Optional Consent was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 2 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.