Parks v. SSA Commissioner
Case Summary
A notice of appearance has been filed in the case of Parks v. SSA Commissioner in the Northern District of California. The docket number is 26-cv-00990. This filing typically indicates that an attorney is formally representing one of the parties. The specific claims or defenses in this Social Security appeal are not detailed.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Social Security appeal
- • Legal representation
- • Administrative law
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-07424 Ahrai v. SSA Commissioner
Other · May 02, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 02, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes SSA Commissioner, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Parks v. SSA Commissioner is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 26-cv-00990.
The main identified defendant or respondent is JOHNSON & JOHNSON and SSA Commissioner. The case is currently organized around Agency action and administrative review, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 2, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied a motion to intervene in the case Ahrai v. SSA Commissioner, which is related to the case Parks v. SSA Commissioner.
This means that the parties in Ahrai v. SSA Commissioner will not be allowed to participate in the Parks case. The denial of.
On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Appearance was filed. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The SSA Commissioner has released the administrative transcript in the case of Parks v. SSA Commissioner, case number 3:26-cv-00990.
This transcript contains the record of the SSA's decision-making process. The release of the transcript is a significant.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
3 events3:25-cv-07424 Ahrai v. SSA Commissioner
The court denied a motion to intervene in the case Ahrai v. SSA Commissioner, which is related to the case Parks v. SSA Commissioner. This means that the parties in Ahrai v. SSA Commissioner will not be allowed to participate in the Parks case. The denial of the motion is significant because it limits the scope of the Parks case.
3:26-cv-00990 YEE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
3:26-cv-00990 Parks v. SSA Commissioner
The SSA Commissioner has released the administrative transcript in the case of Parks v. SSA Commissioner, case number 3:26-cv-00990. This transcript contains the record of the SSA's decision-making process. The release of the transcript is a significant development in the case.
Press Coverage
3:26-cv-00990 YEE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
Notice of Appearance ( 3
3:26-cv-00990 Parks v. SSA Commissioner
SSA Administrative Transcript ( 8
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
14 hours, 20 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.