Pappas et al v. City of New York

description

Case Summary

Pappas et al filed a rule 56.1 statement in the case against the City of New York in the unknown court. This indicates that Pappas et al are seeking to support their claims with evidence and may be seeking summary judgment.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

• • Rule 56.1 Statement
• • City of New York
• • Unknown Court

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

Case Timeline

2 events

info

Other April 27, 2026

1:19-cv-08745 Johnson v. City of New York

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a mandate in Johnson v. City of New York, a case related to Pappas et al v. City of New York. This mandate indicates that the appeals court has affirmed the lower court's decision. The mandate is a formal order that the lower court must follow the appeals court's ruling.

description View filing open_in_new

info

Other April 24, 2026

1:23-cv-06010 Pappas et al v. City of New York

The City of New York filed a Rule 56.1 statement in the case Pappas et al v. City of New York (1:23-cv-06010), which is a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. This filing is a key step in the litigation process, as it outlines the city's position on the case. The statement will likely influence the court's decision on the motion.

description View filing open_in_new

show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles

All No paywall (2) Original reporting (2)

newspaper

Coverage

1:19-cv-08745 Johnson v. City of New York

USCA Mandate ( 175

Apr 27, 2026 · 1 min read

newspaper

Coverage

1:23-cv-06010 Pappas et al v. City of New York

Rule 56.1 Statement ( 161

Apr 24, 2026 · 1 min read