PALMER v. BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD et al
Case Summary
The court appointed counsel for Palmer in the case USA v. Palmer (1:21-cr-00147-1). This appointment is a routine step in the criminal justice process, ensuring Palmer has representation throughout the proceedings. The appointment of counsel is significant because it guarantees Palmer's right to a fair trial.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Criminal charges and procedural posture
- • Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
- • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
Docket Snapshot
Court
D. Colo.
District of Colorado · 10th Circuit · CO
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:21-cr-00147-1 USA v. Palmer
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
7 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Colorado, a federal district court in CO.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Yanet Cardozo, BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD, 2:26-cv-04772 Rogelio Santibanez and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
PALMER v. BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD et al is an active criminal matter in District of Colorado under docket 26-cv-04772.
The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-04772 Rogelio Santibanez on one side and BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD and Yanet Cardozo on the other. The case is currently organized around Criminal charges and procedural posture, Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court appointed counsel for Palmer in the case USA v. Palmer (1:21-cr-00147-1). This appointment is a routine step in the criminal justice process, ensuring Palmer has representation throughout the proceedings.
The appointment of counsel is significant. On May 3, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an intradistrict transfer of the case Rogelio Santibanez v. Yanet Cardozo et al to the correct docket.
This transfer was necessary due to a clerical error. The transfer will allow the case to proceed correctly. On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to dismiss the case PALMER v. BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD et al, citing lack of jurisdiction. This decision means the case will not proceed. The plaintiff's claims against the Borough of Spotswood and other defendants will not be heard.
On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied a motion in the case of Palmer v. Borough of Spotswood et al, case number 3:26-cv-04772. This decision means that the motion will not be granted, and the case will proceed as previously scheduled.
The court's ruling is significant because it.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
District of Colorado (D. Colo.) is a federal district court in the 10th Circuit, CO.
Case Timeline
4 events1:21-cr-00147-1 USA v. Palmer
The court appointed counsel for Palmer in the case USA v. Palmer (1:21-cr-00147-1). This appointment is a routine step in the criminal justice process, ensuring Palmer has representation throughout the proceedings. The appointment of counsel is significant because it guarantees Palmer's right to a fair trial.
2:26-cv-04772 Rogelio Santibanez v. Yanet Cardozo et al
The court granted an intradistrict transfer of the case Rogelio Santibanez v. Yanet Cardozo et al to the correct docket. This transfer was necessary due to a clerical error. The transfer will allow the case to proceed correctly.
3:26-cv-04772 PALMER v. BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD et al
The court denied a motion in the case of Palmer v. Borough of Spotswood et al, case number 3:26-cv-04772. This decision means that the motion will not be granted, and the case will proceed as previously scheduled. The court's ruling is significant because it sets the stage for the next phase of the litigation.
2:26-cv-04772 PALMER v. BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD et al
The court granted a motion to dismiss the case PALMER v. BOROUGH OF SPOTSWOOD et al, citing lack of jurisdiction. This decision means the case will not proceed. The plaintiff's claims against the Borough of Spotswood and other defendants will not be heard.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
2:26-cv-04772 Rogelio Santibanez v. Yanet Cardozo et al
Intradistrict Transfer - Clerical Error (G-73) - optional html form ( 5
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
7 hours, 54 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.