3:23-cv-01499 Pacheco et al v. Culturalink, LLC
Order on Motion to Amend/Correct ( 63
Pacheco and others filed a lawsuit against Culturalink, LLC, docket number 23-cv-01499. The court granted a motion to amend or correct the filings. This allows the plaintiffs to modify their legal arguments or claims.
Latest development
Order · April 24, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:23-cv-01499 Pacheco et al v. Culturalink, LLC
Order · Apr 24, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 24, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Culturalink, LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Pacheco et al Sues Culturalink, LLC in Federal Court is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 23-cv-01499.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Culturalink, LLC. The case is currently organized around motion to amend/correct, order granted, case ongoing.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a order: A Motion was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A Motion was filed.
Order on Motion to Amend/Correct ( 63
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
11 hours, 17 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.