OTT v. STILL et al: Substitution of Attorney
Case Summary
The court allowed a substitution of attorney in the case of OTT v. STILL et al, permitting a new lawyer to represent the plaintiff. This change typically occurs when the original attorney is no longer able to continue representing the client. The substitution of attorney does not affect the underlying case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-17301 OTT v. STILL et al
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
1 event2:25-cv-17301 OTT v. STILL et al
The court allowed a substitution of attorney in the case of OTT v. STILL et al, permitting a new lawyer to represent the plaintiff. This change typically occurs when the original attorney is no longer able to continue representing the client. The substitution of attorney does not affect the underlying case.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
23 hours, 51 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.