civil-litigation administrative-law government-litigation federal-courts

Oscar Duron-De Luna v. Lepe

25-cv-04340 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A Status Report was filed in the civil case Oscar Duron-De Luna v. Lepe on June 10, 2024. The case is proceeding in the Central District of California. Status reports provide the court with an update on the progress of the litigation. This filing suggests the case is actively moving through the legal process.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Status report
  • Case progress
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-04340 DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al

Other · May 07, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency, 2 Plaintiffs

5 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 1:25-cv-04340 DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION, 2:25-cv-04340 Oscar Duron-De Luna and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 6 hours, 27 minutes ago

Oscar Duron-De Luna v. Lepe is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-04340.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-04340 DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION and 2:25-cv-04340 Oscar Duron-De Luna on one side and US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE on the other. The case is currently organized around Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims, Agency action and administrative review, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 7, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint status report. On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation in the case of Oscar Duron-De Luna v. Lepe, indicating that a decision has been made.

This report will now be reviewed by the district court judge. The outcome of the case will be determined based on.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 7, 2026

1:25-cv-04340 DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al

The parties filed a joint status report.

info
Other May 6, 2026

2:25-cv-04340 Oscar Duron-De Luna v. Lepe

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation in the case of Oscar Duron-De Luna v. Lepe, indicating that a decision has been made. This report will now be reviewed by the district court judge. The outcome of the case will be determined based on this recommendation.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 hour, 36 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.