newspaper
civil-litigation
court-opinion
Seventh Circuit Rules in Shiba v. Mullin
7th Cir.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The Seventh Circuit ruled in Shiba v. Mullin, addressing habeas corpus claims and procedural default issues in post-conviction relief. The court analyzed the application of federal habeas standards to state convictions.
Latest development
Dored Shiba v. Markwayne Mullin: Opinion Issued
Opinion · May 5, 2026
The court issued a written opinion.
Key Issues
- • Habeas corpus
- • Procedural default
- • Post-conviction relief
- • Federal review of state convictions
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
7th Cir.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 7th Circuit
tag
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
timeline
Stage
Opinion issued
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
Dored Shiba v. Markwayne Mullin: Opinion Issued
Opinion · May 05, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, a federal appeals court.
The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Markwayne Mullin, Dored Shiba.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (7th Cir.) is a federal appellate court in the 7th Circuit.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
menu_book
Opinion
May 5, 2026
Dored Shiba v. Markwayne Mullin: Opinion Issued
The court issued a written opinion.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 12 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.