civil-litigation court-opinion insurance tort

Jones v. Mutual of Omaha Opinion Issued

Active Opinion issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Thomas Jones and Deborah Jones, husband and wife v. Mutual of Omaha is a case where the plaintiffs, Thomas Jones and Deborah Jones, sued the defendant, Mutual of Omaha, for damages. The case involves a dispute over an insurance policy.

Latest development

Thomas Jones and Deborah Jones Husband and Wife v. Mutual of Omaha: Opinion Issued

Opinion · April 29, 2026

The court issued a written opinion.

Key Issues

  • insurance policy
  • damages
  • dispute
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Opinion issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

Thomas Jones and Deborah Jones Husband and Wife v. Mutual of Omaha: Opinion Issued

Opinion · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated April 29, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Mutual of Omaha, Thomas Jones and Deborah Jones Husband and Wife.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
menu_book
Opinion April 29, 2026

Thomas Jones and Deborah Jones Husband and Wife v. Mutual of Omaha: Opinion Issued

The court issued a written opinion.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

4 hours, 51 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.