legal-news

/opinion/10848443/beth-bennett-v-office-of-personnel-management/

Active Opinion issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Civil case currently marked active. Latest development: /opinion/10848441/cynthia-bailey-v-office-of-personnel-management/. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.

Latest development

/opinion/10848441/cynthia-bailey-v-office-of-personnel-management/

Opinion · April 27, 2026

The court issued a written opinion.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Opinion issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

/opinion/10848441/cynthia-bailey-v-office-of-personnel-management/

Opinion · Apr 27, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

0 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated April 27, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
menu_book
Opinion April 27, 2026

/opinion/10848441/cynthia-bailey-v-office-of-personnel-management/

The court issued a written opinion.

menu_book
Opinion April 27, 2026

/opinion/10848443/beth-bennett-v-office-of-personnel-management/

The court issued a written opinion.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

20 hours, 18 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.