civil-litigation court-opinion

Jose Carlos Revilla Patricio sues Field Office Director Christopher Bullock over alleged unconstitutional acts

Active Opinion issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Jose Carlos Revilla Patricio v. Christopher Bullock, Field Office Director is a case involving a lawsuit against a field office director. The lawsuit alleges that the field office director has been engaging in unconstitutional practices.

Latest development

Jose Carlos Revilla Patricio v. Christopher Bullock Field Office Director: Opinion Issued

Opinion · April 26, 2026

The court issued a written opinion.

Key Issues

  • unconstitutional practices
  • field office director
  • immigration
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Opinion issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

Jose Carlos Revilla Patricio v. Christopher Bullock Field Office Director: Opinion Issued

Opinion · Apr 26, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency, 1 Plaintiff

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated April 26, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Christopher Bullock Field Office Director, Jose Carlos Revilla Patricio and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
menu_book
Opinion April 26, 2026

Jose Carlos Revilla Patricio v. Christopher Bullock Field Office Director: Opinion Issued

The court issued a written opinion.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 days, 16 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.