3:24-cv-30068 Opalenik v. City of Northampton et al
Extension of Time ( 74
The court granted an extension of time for the plaintiff, Opalenik, in the case of Opalenik v. City of Northampton et al, allowing them more time to proceed with the case. This extension is likely due to ongoing litigation or other procedural delays. The extension will give the plaintiff more time to prepare and present their case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:24-cv-30068 Opalenik v. City of Northampton et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes City of Northampton, 3:24-cv-30068 Opalenik.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Opalenik v. City of Northampton et al is an active civil matter in District of Massachusetts under docket 24-cv-30068.
The dispute currently identifies 3:24-cv-30068 Opalenik on one side and City of Northampton on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, government litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the plaintiff, Opalenik, in the case of Opalenik v. City of Northampton et al, allowing them more time to proceed with the case. This extension is likely due to ongoing litigation or other procedural delays.
The.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
The court granted an extension of time for the plaintiff, Opalenik, in the case of Opalenik v. City of Northampton et al, allowing them more time to proceed with the case. This extension is likely due to ongoing litigation or other procedural delays. The extension will give the plaintiff more time to prepare and present their case.
Extension of Time ( 74
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
14 hours, 54 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.