Olivia T. and James Bouknight et al agree on panel mediator in California civil case

description

Case Summary

Olivia T. v. James Bouknight et al is a civil case with a stipulation regarding the selection of a panel mediator. The parties have consented to the mediator's selection, as indicated by the ADR-2 document. This stipulation is a significant development in the case, as it outlines the process for resolving the dispute through mediation.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

• • selection of panel mediator
• • ADR-2 document
• • mediation process

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:24-cv-09736 Olivia T. v. James Bouknight et al

Other · Apr 27, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes James Bouknight and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 10 hours ago

Olivia T. v. James Bouknight et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 24-cv-09736.

The main identified defendant or respondent is James Bouknight. The case is currently organized around selection of panel mediator, ADR-2 document, mediation process.

James Bouknight et al is a civil case with a stipulation regarding the selection of a panel mediator. The parties have consented to the mediator's selection, as indicated by the ADR-2 document. This stipulation is a significant development in the case, as it outlines the process for resolving the dispute through mediation.

On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint stipulation.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other April 27, 2026

2:24-cv-09736 Olivia T. v. James Bouknight et al

The parties filed a joint stipulation.

description View filing open_in_new

newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article

All No paywall (1) Original reporting (1)

newspaper

Coverage

2:24-cv-09736 Olivia T. v. James Bouknight et al

Stipulation Regarding Selection of Panel Mediator (Consent) - (ADR-2) ( 40

Apr 27, 2026 · 1 min read