civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

O'DONNELL v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al

24-cv-04457 D.N.J.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

O'DONNELL has filed a civil action against SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC and other defendants in the District of New Jersey. No specific filings or actions are detailed in the provided summary.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Personal injury
  • Premises liability
  • Amusement park
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:24-cv-07000 LYNCH v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al

Other · May 06, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC, 3:24-cv-04457 O'DONNELL and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 10 hours, 13 minutes ago

O'DONNELL v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 24-cv-04457.

The dispute currently identifies 3:24-cv-04457 O'DONNELL on one side and SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A new case, LYNCH v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al, was filed in the same court as O'DONNELL v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al, with the same defendant.

This suggests that multiple plaintiffs are pursuing similar claims against the same. On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied a motion in the O'DONNELL v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al case, which means the motion was rejected and the case will proceed as planned.

The motion was likely filed by one of the parties to delay or dismiss the case, but the court's.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 6, 2026

3:24-cv-07000 LYNCH v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al

A new case, LYNCH v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al, was filed in the same court as O'DONNELL v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al, with the same defendant. This suggests that multiple plaintiffs are pursuing similar claims against the same defendant. The filing of this new case may indicate a coordinated effort to address common issues.

info
Other May 6, 2026

3:24-cv-04457 O'DONNELL v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al

The court denied a motion in the O'DONNELL v. SIX FLAGS GREAT ADVENTURE, LLC et al case, which means the motion was rejected and the case will proceed as planned. The motion was likely filed by one of the parties to delay or dismiss the case, but the court's decision allows the case to move forward. This decision is significant because it will impact the progress of the case and potentially affect the outcome.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

4 hours, 51 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.