civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

N.Z. Files Attorney Change Notice in CD Cal

24-cv-01655 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In case 24-cv-01655 in the Central District of California, N.Z. filed a notice of attorney change. This procedural update informs the court and parties of new legal representation. It does not affect substantive case issues but may impact communication and strategy.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Attorney change
  • Procedural update
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

8:24-cv-01655 N.Z. et al v. Fenix International Limited et al

Other · May 08, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Fenix International Ltd.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 8, 2026

8:24-cv-01655 N.Z. et al v. Fenix International Limited et al

A Notice of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 days, 8 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.