legal-news

Nunes v. JDH Flooring Inc et al

26-cv-61315 S.D. Fla.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court denied Nunes' motion to remand the case back to state court, allowing the federal lawsuit against JDH Flooring Inc and others to proceed. This decision means that the case will continue in federal court, where Nunes is seeking damages for alleged defects in flooring products. The ruling is significant because it sets the stage for further litigation in federal court.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D. Fla.

Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

0:26-cv-61315 Nunes v. JDH Flooring Inc et al

Other · May 01, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes JDH Flooring Inc and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 1, 2026

0:26-cv-61315 Nunes v. JDH Flooring Inc et al

The court denied Nunes' motion to remand the case back to state court, allowing the federal lawsuit against JDH Flooring Inc and others to proceed. This decision means that the case will continue in federal court, where Nunes is seeking damages for alleged defects in flooring products. The ruling is significant because it sets the stage for further litigation in federal court.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 5 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.