Notice of Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence

description

Case Summary

Defendant Travis Russell filed a notice regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence in the case. The filing was made by counsel Andrew Cortopassi and entered on March 2, 2026. This notice likely pertains to disclosure or procedural requirements related to AI tools used in litigation.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

• • Use of generative AI
• • Disclosure
• • Litigation technology

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

NOTICE re: use of generative artificial intelligence filed by Defendant Travis Russell. (Cortopassi, Andrew) (Entered:

Other · May 10, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

0 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 10, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other May 10, 2026

NOTICE re: use of generative artificial intelligence filed by Defendant Travis Russell. (Cortopassi, Andrew) (Entered: 03/02/2026)

Travis Russell, the defendant, filed a notice with the court about his use of generative artificial intelligence. This move suggests he may be seeking to use AI-generated evidence or testimony in the case. The court will now consider the implications of AI-generated content on the proceedings.