newspaper
2:22-cv-07358 NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al
Substitute Attorney ( 38
Apr 28, 2026
1 min read
civil-litigation
federal-courts
court-watch
NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al
22-cv-07358
D.N.J.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al. The defendant's attorney has been substituted. The court will review the request and make a decision.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Substitute Attorney
- • NOORCHASHM
- • BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
2:22-cv-07358 NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al
Other · Apr 28, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY, 2:22-cv-07358 NOORCHASHM.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
chronic
Updated 13 hours ago
The Story So Far
NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 22-cv-07358.
The dispute currently identifies 2:22-cv-07358 NOORCHASHM on one side and BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY on the other. The case is currently organized around Substitute Attorney, NOORCHASHM, BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court substituted attorney 38 in the case of NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al. This change is likely due to a request from one of the parties or a court order.
The substitution of attorneys can impact the case's progress and strategy.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
info
Other
April 28, 2026
2:22-cv-07358 NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al
The court substituted attorney 38 in the case of NOORCHASHM v. BECTON, DICKINSON and COMPANY et al. This change is likely due to a request from one of the parties or a court order. The substitution of attorneys can impact the case's progress and strategy.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
13 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.