civil-litigation labor-law federal-courts court-watch

Newman v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union et al. - Withdrawal of Attorney

25-cv-09884 N.D. Ill.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Newman v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union et al. is a civil case involving the withdrawal of an attorney. The court has not been specified, but the docket number is 25-cv-09884. The current summary indicates that the attorney has withdrawn from the case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • withdrawal of attorney
  • unknown court
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Ill.

Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

4:25-cv-09884 Orellana et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Other · May 13, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

3 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Pentagon Federal Credit Union, Guardian News & Media LLC, Nissan North America Inc and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 18 hours ago

Newman v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union et al. - Withdrawal of Attorney is an active civil matter in Northern District of Illinois under docket 25-cv-09884.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-09884 Julie Dermansky Photography LLC on one side and Guardian News & Media LLC and Pentagon Federal Credit Union on the other. The case is currently organized around withdrawal of attorney, unknown court.

is a civil case involving the withdrawal of an attorney. The court has not been specified, but the docket number is 25-cv-09884. The current summary indicates that the attorney has withdrawn from the case.

On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court set or revised the case schedule. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: Attorney withdrew from the case Newman v. This action is significant because it may impact the case's progress and potentially delay or alter the litigation strategy.

The attorney's withdrawal may also lead to a change in.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other May 12, 2026

4:25-cv-09884 Orellana et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.

The court set or revised the case schedule.

info
Other May 6, 2026

1:25-cv-09884 Julie Dermansky Photography LLC v. Guardian News & Media LLC et al

The court set or revised the case schedule.

info
Other April 24, 2026

1:25-cv-09884 Newman v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union et al

Attorney withdrew from the case Newman v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union et al. This action is significant because it may impact the case's progress and potentially delay or alter the litigation strategy. The attorney's withdrawal may also lead to a change in representation for the plaintiff.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

4 days, 18 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.