NEI General Contracting, Inc. v. Utica National Assurance Company et al is a civil case with certification pursuant to Rule 16.1. The case is currently pending in an unknown court with docket number 26-cv-10068. The case involves NEI General Contracting, Inc. suing Utica National Assurance Company and others.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04311 NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. BLADE GENERAL CONTRACTING INC.
Other · Apr 23, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Utica National Assurance Company, BLADE GENERAL CONTRACTING INC, NEI General Contracting, Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
NEI General Contracting, Inc. v. Utica National Assurance Company et al is an active appellate matter in District of New Jersey under docket 26-cv-10068.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-10068 NEI General Contracting, Inc and 2:26-cv-04311 NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF on one side and BLADE GENERAL CONTRACTING INC and Utica National Assurance Company on the other.
The case is currently organized around Insurance coverage, bad faith, or claims handling, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Issues preserved for appellate review, Appellate posture and standard of review.
Utica National Assurance Company et al is a civil case with certification pursuant to Rule 16.1. The case is currently pending in an unknown court with docket number 26-cv-10068. The case involves NEI General Contracting, Inc.
suing Utica National Assurance Company and others.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The New Jersey Building Laborers Statewide Benefit Funds and its trustees filed a corporate disclosure statement in the case of Blade General Contracting Inc. against Utica National Assurance Company and others. This filing is a routine update of the parties.
On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court certified a question to the New York Court of Appeals regarding the interpretation of a policy exclusion in a construction insurance policy. This certification was made pursuant to Rule 16.1 of the New York Rules of Civil Procedure. The question is.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
The New Jersey Building Laborers Statewide Benefit Funds and its trustees filed a corporate disclosure statement in the case of Blade General Contracting Inc. against Utica National Assurance Company and others. This filing is a routine update of the parties involved in the case. The disclosure statement provides information about the corporate structure and ownership of the parties.
The court certified a question to the New York Court of Appeals regarding the interpretation of a policy exclusion in a construction insurance policy. This certification was made pursuant to Rule 16.1 of the New York Rules of Civil Procedure. The question is significant because it will impact the outcome of the case and potentially set a precedent for future cases involving similar policy exclusions.
Corporate Disclosure Statement (aty) ( 3
Certification pursuant to Rule 16.1 ( 19
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.