legal-news

Negron v. Bisignano

25-cv-12364 N.D. Ill.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Negron v. Bisignano is a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case was filed on May 12, 2025, and assigned docket number 25-cv-12364. The plaintiff, Negron, alleges that Bisignano has engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices. The plaintiff seeks damages and injunctive relief. The case is ongoing.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

19 events

Coverage

18 articles

Sources

3

Key Issues

  • Unfair and deceptive business practices
  • Damages and injunctive relief
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Ill.

Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:26-cv-04790 Guzman v. Bisignano

Other · Apr 28, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

18 articles

3 sources tracked

groups

Participants

3 Plaintiffs

19 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes 3:25-cv-50421 Benton White, 1:25-cv-12312 Robinson, 3:25-cv-50435 Robinson and others.

Press monitoring has found 18 related articles from 3 distinct sources.

About This Court

Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

19 events
info
Other April 27, 2026

1:26-cv-04790 Guzman v. Bisignano

The court has joined the cases of Negron v. Bisignano and Guzman v. Bisignano, allowing the plaintiffs to combine their lawsuits against Bisignano. This consolidation will streamline the litigation process and potentially reduce costs for both parties. The move is significant because it will allow the court to efficiently manage the cases and make a more informed decision.

edit_note
Motion April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-12312 Robinson v. Bisignano

A Motion was filed.

gavel
Order April 27, 2026

0:26-cv-60995 Tardino v. Bisignano

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-14329 Long v. Bisignano

The court granted an extension of time for the defendant, Bisignano, to file a document in the case Long v. Bisignano (1:25-cv-14329). This extension allows Bisignano more time to prepare and submit the required document. The extension is significant because it gives Bisignano a chance to correct any issues with the document.

edit_note
Motion April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-13920 Baker v. Bisignano

A Motion was filed.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-12269 Molek v. Bisignano

A response was filed.

edit_note
Motion April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-13415 Ramos v. Bisignano

A Motion was filed.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:24-cv-03050 Casper v. Bisignano

The court terminated the civil case of Casper v. Bisignano. This action effectively closed the case, bringing it to a final resolution. The termination of the case means that the parties are no longer involved in litigation.

edit_note
Motion April 27, 2026

3:25-cv-13570 Swegel v. Bisignano

A Motion was filed.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-10751 Roscoe v. Bisignano

A response was filed.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-13183 Pollock v. Bisignano

The court granted a motion for attorney fees in the case of Pollock v. Bisignano, awarding costs to the prevailing party. This decision is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving attorney fees. The ruling will impact the financial burden on parties in similar disputes.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-13183 Pollock v. Bisignano

The court granted a motion for attorney fees in the case of Pollock v. Bisignano, awarding costs to the prevailing party. This decision is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving attorney fees. The ruling will impact the financial burden on parties in similar disputes.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:24-cv-06205 Lewis v. Bisignano

The court entered judgment.

edit_note
Pleading April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-06667 Carr v. Bisignano

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 27, 2026

3:26-cv-50167 Sacco v. Bisignano

The court has denied a motion in the case of Sacco v. Bisignano, which is related to the case of Negron v. Bisignano. This decision means that the motion will not be heard by the court. The motion was likely an attempt to delay or dismiss the case.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:26-cv-11415 Olivier v. Bisignano

The parties in Olivier v. Bisignano have consented to jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge, allowing the case to proceed in the lower court. This decision is significant because it gives the magistrate judge the authority to make rulings and decisions in the case. The case is now one step closer to resolution.

info
Other April 27, 2026

3:25-cv-50435 Robinson v. Bisignano

The court has denied a motion in the case of Robinson v. Bisignano, which is related to the ongoing litigation in Negron v. Bisignano. This decision may impact the progress of the Negron case. The specifics of the motion and the reasoning behind the denial are not immediately clear.

info
Other April 27, 2026

3:25-cv-50421 Benton White v. Bisignano

The court granted an extension of time for the defendant, Bisignano, in the case of Benton White v. Bisignano (3:25-cv-50421). This means that Bisignano now has more time to respond to the case. The extension is likely due to the complexity of the case or the need for additional time to prepare a defense.

edit_note
Motion April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-12364 Negron v. Bisignano

A Motion was filed.

Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

18 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 18 articles

Timeline events

19 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 8 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.