Negron v. Bisignano
Case Summary
Negron v. Bisignano is a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case was filed on May 12, 2025, and assigned docket number 25-cv-12364. The plaintiff, Negron, alleges that Bisignano has engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices. The plaintiff seeks damages and injunctive relief. The case is ongoing.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
19 events
Coverage
18 articles
Sources
3
Key Issues
- • Unfair and deceptive business practices
- • Damages and injunctive relief
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-04790 Guzman v. Bisignano
Other · Apr 28, 2026
Coverage
18 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
3 Plaintiffs
19 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 3:25-cv-50421 Benton White, 1:25-cv-12312 Robinson, 3:25-cv-50435 Robinson and others.
Press monitoring has found 18 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
About This Court
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
Case Timeline
19 events1:26-cv-04790 Guzman v. Bisignano
The court has joined the cases of Negron v. Bisignano and Guzman v. Bisignano, allowing the plaintiffs to combine their lawsuits against Bisignano. This consolidation will streamline the litigation process and potentially reduce costs for both parties. The move is significant because it will allow the court to efficiently manage the cases and make a more informed decision.
1:25-cv-12312 Robinson v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
0:26-cv-60995 Tardino v. Bisignano
The court issued an order.
1:25-cv-14329 Long v. Bisignano
The court granted an extension of time for the defendant, Bisignano, to file a document in the case Long v. Bisignano (1:25-cv-14329). This extension allows Bisignano more time to prepare and submit the required document. The extension is significant because it gives Bisignano a chance to correct any issues with the document.
1:25-cv-13920 Baker v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
1:25-cv-12269 Molek v. Bisignano
A response was filed.
1:25-cv-13415 Ramos v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
1:24-cv-03050 Casper v. Bisignano
The court terminated the civil case of Casper v. Bisignano. This action effectively closed the case, bringing it to a final resolution. The termination of the case means that the parties are no longer involved in litigation.
3:25-cv-13570 Swegel v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
1:25-cv-10751 Roscoe v. Bisignano
A response was filed.
1:25-cv-13183 Pollock v. Bisignano
The court granted a motion for attorney fees in the case of Pollock v. Bisignano, awarding costs to the prevailing party. This decision is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving attorney fees. The ruling will impact the financial burden on parties in similar disputes.
1:25-cv-13183 Pollock v. Bisignano
The court granted a motion for attorney fees in the case of Pollock v. Bisignano, awarding costs to the prevailing party. This decision is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving attorney fees. The ruling will impact the financial burden on parties in similar disputes.
1:24-cv-06205 Lewis v. Bisignano
The court entered judgment.
1:25-cv-06667 Carr v. Bisignano
The court entered judgment.
3:26-cv-50167 Sacco v. Bisignano
The court has denied a motion in the case of Sacco v. Bisignano, which is related to the case of Negron v. Bisignano. This decision means that the motion will not be heard by the court. The motion was likely an attempt to delay or dismiss the case.
1:26-cv-11415 Olivier v. Bisignano
The parties in Olivier v. Bisignano have consented to jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge, allowing the case to proceed in the lower court. This decision is significant because it gives the magistrate judge the authority to make rulings and decisions in the case. The case is now one step closer to resolution.
3:25-cv-50435 Robinson v. Bisignano
The court has denied a motion in the case of Robinson v. Bisignano, which is related to the ongoing litigation in Negron v. Bisignano. This decision may impact the progress of the Negron case. The specifics of the motion and the reasoning behind the denial are not immediately clear.
3:25-cv-50421 Benton White v. Bisignano
The court granted an extension of time for the defendant, Bisignano, in the case of Benton White v. Bisignano (3:25-cv-50421). This means that Bisignano now has more time to respond to the case. The extension is likely due to the complexity of the case or the need for additional time to prepare a defense.
1:25-cv-12364 Negron v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
Press Coverage
0:26-cv-60995 Tardino v. Bisignano
Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached) ( 4
1:25-cv-14329 Long v. Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Document ( 15
1:25-cv-12269 Molek v. Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 18
1:25-cv-13415 Ramos v. Bisignano
Memorandum in Support of Motion ( 16
1:24-cv-03050 Casper v. Bisignano
~Util - Terminate Civil Case ( 26
3:25-cv-13570 Swegel v. Bisignano
Memorandum in Support of Motion ( 17
1:25-cv-10751 Roscoe v. Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 20
1:26-cv-11415 Olivier v. Bisignano
Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge ( 8
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 18 articles
Timeline events
19 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.