legal-news

NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT

26-cv-01544 S.D. Fla.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court granted a motion to withdraw as attorney for Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network in the case 1:23-cv-02359. This means that the attorney is no longer representing the organization in this case. The withdrawal does not affect the case's progress.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D. Fla.

Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:23-cv-02359 Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Other · May 07, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

4 articles

4 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 4 Plaintiffs

7 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, 1:26-cv-01544 NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD and others.

Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 4 distinct sources.

About This Court

Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

4 events
info
Other May 7, 2026

1:23-cv-02359 Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

The court granted a motion to withdraw as attorney for Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network in the case 1:23-cv-02359. This means that the attorney is no longer representing the organization in this case. The withdrawal does not affect the case's progress.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other May 6, 2026

2:26-cv-01544 Ciene-Nzala v. Blanche et al

A federal judge has granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a case involving a detainee, Ciene-Nzala, who is being held by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The writ allows the detainee to challenge the lawfulness of their detention. This decision is significant because it allows the detainee to seek release from custody.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other May 5, 2026

1:26-cv-23178 Mayorga Valle v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Judge assigned to Mayorga Valle v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a case related to the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. This assignment is significant because it sets the stage for the case's progression. The judge's role will be key in shaping the outcome.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other May 5, 2026

1:26-cv-01544 NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT

The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild filed a lawsuit against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over the agency's use of expedited removal proceedings. The lawsuit claims that ICE is violating the due process rights of immigrants by denying them access to counsel and other basic rights. This lawsuit matters because it challenges the Trump administration's policies on immigration.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

4 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

4 outlets · 4 articles

Timeline events

4 records on file

Last updated

2 hours, 18 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.