civil-litigation government-litigation federal-courts

Muthana files proposed summons in civil case against United States in Northern District of California

26-cv-04346 N.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Muthana filed a proposed summons in a civil case against the United States in the Northern District of California, docket 26-cv-04346. The summons initiates formal service of process on the defendant.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Service of process
  • Federal defendant
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:26-cv-04346 MUTHANA v. United States of America

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes United States of America and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

3:26-cv-04346 MUTHANA v. United States of America

A Summons was issued.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 hours, 53 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.