newspaper
legal-news
Murray v. Martin O'Malley: Attorney Fees Dispute
23-cv-03867
C.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court has denied a motion for attorney fees in the case Genene Frank v. Martin J. O'Malley, citing a lack of sufficient evidence to support the claim. This decision means that the plaintiff will not be awarded any additional compensation for their legal costs. The court's ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving attorney fee disputes.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
5:24-cv-00742 Genene Frank v. Martin J. O Malley
Other · May 02, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 02, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Martin O'Malley, Martin J. O Malley, 5:24-cv-00742 Genene Frank and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 2, 2026
5:24-cv-00742 Genene Frank v. Martin J. O Malley
The court has denied a motion for attorney fees in the case Genene Frank v. Martin J. O'Malley, citing a lack of sufficient evidence to support the claim. This decision means that the plaintiff will not be awarded any additional compensation for their legal costs. The court's ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving attorney fee disputes.
info
Other
May 2, 2026
5:23-cv-03867 Murray v. Martin O'Malley
The court has ordered Martin O'Malley to pay attorney fees in the amount of $22, as part of the ongoing case Murray v. Martin O'Malley (5:23-cv-03867). This order is a consequence of a previous court decision. The payment of attorney fees is a common practice in civil cases.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 9 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.