civil-litigation sentencing habeas federal-courts court-watch

Muniz v. CTV Holdings, LLC

26-cv-05052 D.N.J.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A new case, SIBRI-BERMEJO v. BORGEN et al, was filed in the Northern District of California, referencing a writ of habeas corpus petition. This petition is a request for the court to review the detention or imprisonment of an individual. The case is related to Muniz v. CTV Holdings, LLC, but the exact connection is unclear.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Habeas review and custody challenges
  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Sentencing exposure and post-conviction consequences
  • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-cv-05052 SIBRI-BERMEJO v. BORGEN et al

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

5 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes CTV Holdings, LLC, 2:26-cv-05052 SIBRI-BERMEJO and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 13 minutes ago

Muniz v. CTV Holdings, LLC is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 26-cv-05052.

The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-05052 SIBRI-BERMEJO on one side and CTV Holdings, LLC on the other. The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, Habeas review and custody challenges, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Sentencing exposure and post-conviction consequences.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A new case, SIBRI-BERMEJO v. BORGEN et al, was filed in the Northern District of California, referencing a writ of habeas corpus petition. This petition is a request for the court to review the detention or imprisonment of an individual.

The case is related. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Muniz v. CTV Holdings, LLC case.

This means that the sealed documents will not be publicly available. The court's decision is likely intended to protect sensitive information.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 5, 2026

2:26-cv-05052 SIBRI-BERMEJO v. BORGEN et al

A new case, SIBRI-BERMEJO v. BORGEN et al, was filed in the Northern District of California, referencing a writ of habeas corpus petition. This petition is a request for the court to review the detention or imprisonment of an individual. The case is related to Muniz v. CTV Holdings, LLC, but the exact connection is unclear.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:26-cv-05052 Muniz v. CTV Holdings, LLC

The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Muniz v. CTV Holdings, LLC case. This means that the sealed documents will not be publicly available. The court's decision is likely intended to protect sensitive information.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

13 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.