Morales v. C & LS Legacy Group LLC et al
Case Summary
The case of Morales v. C & LS Legacy Group LLC et al involves a set of hearings. The court has set hearings for the case, but the details of the hearings are not specified. The case is currently ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.
Latest development
2:26-po-00478-1 USA vs Morales
Hearing · April 28, 2026
The court scheduled a hearing for Morales v. C & LS Legacy Group LLC et al, specifically for case 2:26-po-00478-1 USA vs Morales. This hearing is set to take place, but no further details are provided. The purpose of the hearing is not specified.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Set Hearings
- • Ongoing Case
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Hearing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-po-00478-1 USA vs Morales
Hearing · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Related Organization
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a hearing dated April 29, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes C & LS Legacy Group LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events2:26-po-00478-1 USA vs Morales
The court scheduled a hearing for Morales v. C & LS Legacy Group LLC et al, specifically for case 2:26-po-00478-1 USA vs Morales. This hearing is set to take place, but no further details are provided. The purpose of the hearing is not specified.
1:25-cv-24754 Morales v. C & LS Legacy Group LLC et al
The court denied Morales' motion to strike the defendant's expert witness testimony. This decision allows the defendant to present their expert's opinion in the case. The ruling is significant because it could impact the weight given to the expert's testimony during the trial.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
16 hours, 29 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.