legal-news

MOORE et al v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

25-cv-03376 D.D.C.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Civil case in D.D.C. currently marked active. Latest development: 9:15-cr-80003-5 USA v. Moore et al. Coverage tracked from 4 media sources.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.D.C.

District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

9:15-cr-80003-5 USA v. Moore et al

Other · May 07, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

4 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others.

Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

About This Court

District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

4 events
info
Other May 7, 2026

9:15-cr-80003-5 USA v. Moore et al

info
Other May 7, 2026

1:21-cv-03163 WHITMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Notice of Substitution of Counsel ( 63

info
Other May 6, 2026

1:25-cv-03376 MOORE et al v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

A Notice of Substitution of Counsel was filed.

info
Other May 6, 2026

1:24-cv-01775 GERGLER v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

A Notice of Substitution of Counsel was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

4 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 4 articles

Timeline events

4 records on file

Last updated

3 hours, 47 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.