7:24-cv-06122 Blacknall v. City of White Plains et al
~Util - Set Hearings
Montes filed a lawsuit against Chancelight Behavioral Health Therapy & Education. The case is proceeding under docket number 24-cv-06122. The current filing indicates a request for miscellaneous relief.
Latest development
Hearing · April 24, 2026
The court set a hearing for the case Blacknall v. City of White Plains et al, which is related to the case Montes v. Chancelight Behavioral Health Therapy & Education. This hearing is scheduled to take place in the case Blacknall v. City of White Plains et al, which is a separate matter from Montes v. The hearing is likely to address issues related to the case Blacknall v. City of White Plains et al.
description View filingCourt
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Hearing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
7:24-cv-06122 Blacknall v. City of White Plains et al
Hearing · Apr 24, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a hearing dated April 24, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Chancelight Behavioral Health Therapy & Education, City of White Plains, 7:24-cv-06122 Blacknall and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Montes v. Chancelight Behavioral Health Therapy & Education is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 24-cv-06122.
The dispute currently identifies 7:24-cv-06122 Blacknall on one side and Chancelight Behavioral Health Therapy & Education and City of White Plains on the other. The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, School, university, and education-policy disputes, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a hearing: The court set a hearing for the case Blacknall v. City of White Plains et al, which is related to the case Montes v. Chancelight Behavioral Health Therapy & Education.
This hearing is scheduled to take place in the case Blacknall v. City of White Plains et. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted miscellaneous relief in the case of Montes v. Chancelight Behavioral Health Therapy & Education, case number 1:24-cv-06122. This means the court is taking action outside of the normal trial process to address a specific issue. The court's.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest hearing produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
The court set a hearing for the case Blacknall v. City of White Plains et al, which is related to the case Montes v. Chancelight Behavioral Health Therapy & Education. This hearing is scheduled to take place in the case Blacknall v. City of White Plains et al, which is a separate matter from Montes v. The hearing is likely to address issues related to the case Blacknall v. City of White Plains et al.
The court granted miscellaneous relief in the case of Montes v. Chancelight Behavioral Health Therapy & Education, case number 1:24-cv-06122. This means the court is taking action outside of the normal trial process to address a specific issue. The court's decision will have a direct impact on the case's progression.
~Util - Set Hearings
Miscellaneous Relief ( 72
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
11 hours, 15 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.