3:26-cv-04115 LS 715 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 3
The court issued a certificate/notice of interested parties in the case of Moises Villasenor v. City of Downey et al. The docket number for this case is 26-cv-04115. The certificate/notice was issued on an unknown date. The court's decision was based on the filing of the interested parties. The certificate/notice is a brief document that outlines the court's ruling on the filing.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:26-cv-04115 LS 715 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes City of Downey, Uber Technologies, Inc, 2:26-cv-04115 Moises Villasenor and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The City of Downey filed a Certificate of Interested Entities in the Moises Villasenor v. City of Downey case, which is a civil lawsuit (3:26-cv-04115 LS). This filing is a required disclosure of any entities with a financial interest in the case. The certificate lists the City of Downey as an interested party.
A Notice of Interested Parties was filed.
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 3
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties ( 2
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
18 hours, 37 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.