Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al
Case Summary
A Text Only Scheduling Notice was filed in the case of Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al, indicating that the parties have agreed on a schedule for the case. The notice may also provide information about upcoming hearings or other important events in the case. Further information is needed to determine the specifics of the notice.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Scheduling notice
- • James Janecka
- • Case schedule
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:26-cv-00711 SANTOS ISRAEL ALVARADO CHAVEZ v. JAMES JANECKA et al
Other · Apr 23, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes James Janecka, Manning Campbell, JAMES JANECKA and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-03442.
The dispute currently identifies 5:25-cv-03442 Modesta Araujo-Contreras and 5:26-cv-00711 SANTOS ISRAEL ALVARADO CHAVEZ on one side and JAMES JANECKA, James Janecka, and Manning Campbell on the other. The case is currently organized around Scheduling notice, James Janecka, Case schedule.
A Text Only Scheduling Notice was filed in the case of Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al, indicating that the parties have agreed on a schedule for the case. The notice may also provide information about upcoming hearings or other important events in the case.
Further information is needed to determine the specifics of the notice.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A new case, Santos Israel Alvarado Chavez v. James Janecka et al, was filed in the Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al case (5:26-cv-00711).
This new case is a separate lawsuit against the same defendants. The filing of this new case may impact. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has made a ruling in the case of Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al, specifically addressing the matter of 7:25-cv-03442 Buon v. Manning Campbell et al. This ruling has significant implications for the parties involved.
The details of. James Janecka et al, indicating that a text-only notice has been filed. This means that the court is providing a brief, written update on the case's status.
The notice is likely a.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
3 events5:26-cv-00711 SANTOS ISRAEL ALVARADO CHAVEZ v. JAMES JANECKA et al
A new case, Santos Israel Alvarado Chavez v. James Janecka et al, was filed in the Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al case (5:26-cv-00711). This new case is a separate lawsuit against the same defendants. The filing of this new case may impact the ongoing proceedings in the original case.
7:25-cv-03442 Buon v. Manning Campbell et al
The court has made a ruling in the case of Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al, specifically addressing the matter of 7:25-cv-03442 Buon v. Manning Campbell et al. This ruling has significant implications for the parties involved. The details of the ruling are not specified in the provided information.
5:25-cv-03442 Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al
The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al, indicating that a text-only notice has been filed. This means that the court is providing a brief, written update on the case's status. The notice is likely a routine update on the case's progress.
Press Coverage
5:25-cv-03442 Modesta Araujo-Contreras v. James Janecka et al
Text Only Scheduling Notice
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
14 hours, 52 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.