legal-news

Chipotle Sued Over Reply

24-cv-02459 C.D. Cal.
Active Motion practice Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case of Chipotle Sued Over Reply involves a motion related to a reply. The court has received a reply, and the case is currently ongoing. The details of the motion and the outcome of the case are not yet known.

Latest development

8:24-cv-02459 Michael Stradford v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. et al

Motion · April 28, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Reply
  • Motion
  • Ongoing Case
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Motion practice

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

8:24-cv-02459 Michael Stradford v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. et al

Motion · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated April 29, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc, 8:24-cv-02459 Michael Stradford.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
edit_note
Motion April 28, 2026

8:24-cv-02459 Michael Stradford v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. et al

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 15 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.