civil-litigation settlement federal-courts

Stipulation of dismissal filed in Menter v. Vesync Corp. in District of Massachusetts

24-cv-12786 D. Mass.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Menter filed a stipulation of dismissal against Vesync Corp. in the District of Massachusetts. The parties agreed to dismiss the case, likely resolving the dispute outside court or by settlement.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Stipulation of dismissal
  • Case resolution
  • Settlement
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Mass.

District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:24-cv-12786 Menter v. Vesync Corp.

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Vesync Corporation.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 12, 2026

3:24-cv-12786 Menter v. Vesync Corp.

The parties filed a joint stipulation.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

12 hours, 56 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.