Meneses-Perera files habeas corpus petition challenging detention in Florida court
Case Summary
Meneses-Perera filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the Southern District of Florida. The petition challenges the legality of his detention, seeking relief from custody. The case is at an early stage with limited docket activity.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Habeas corpus petition
- • Detention legality
- • 28 U.S.C. § 2241
- • Custody challenge
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-12155 Navas Aguirre v. Lyons et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Navas Aguirre and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
Case Timeline
2 events1:26-cv-12155 Navas Aguirre v. Lyons et al
The court received a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the case Navas Aguirre v. Lyons et al, docket number 1:26-cv-12155. This petition challenges the legality of the petitioner’s detention. Habeas corpus petitions are a direct way to seek relief from unlawful imprisonment.
1:26-cv-23346 MENESES-PERERA v. LYONS et al
1:26-cv-23346 MENESES-PERERA v. LYONS et al.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
39 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.