legal-news

Melunsky et al v. LinkedIn Corporation

26-cv-03460
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Melunsky et al v. LinkedIn Corporation is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 26-cv-03460. The current summary is a Proposed Summons. The case is still in its early stages, with only 2 filings to date.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Proposed Summons
  • Unknown Court
  • 26-cv-03460
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 30, 2026

1:26-cv-03460 Robert Bosch GmbH et al v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

The court has ordered the defendants in the Robert Bosch GmbH case to produce a list of all individuals and entities identified on Schedule A. This list is likely to be used to identify potential witnesses or parties in the Melunsky et al v. LinkedIn Corporation case. The order is significant because it may reveal new information about the defendants' connections to the plaintiffs.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:26-cv-03460 Shen et al v. yuan et al

LinkedIn Corporation filed a Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement in the case 1:26-cv-03460 Shen et al v. yuan et al, which is a separate case from Melunsky et al v. LinkedIn Corporation. This statement discloses the corporate structure and ownership of LinkedIn Corporation. The filing is a routine procedural step in the case.

info
Other April 23, 2026

5:26-cv-03460 Melunsky et al v. LinkedIn Corporation

A Summons was issued.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

1 week, 1 day ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.