2:25-cv-06368 Shaquille Maxey-Smith v. City of Los Angeles et al
Text Only Scheduling Notice
Melba Ortega has filed a civil action against the County of Los Angeles and other defendants in the Central District of California. The court has issued a text-only scheduling notice. This notice typically outlines deadlines for discovery and other case management events.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-06368 Shaquille Maxey-Smith v. City of Los Angeles et al
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, 2:24-cv-03687 Melba Ortega and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Melba Ortega v. County of Los Angeles et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 24-cv-03687.
The dispute currently identifies 2:24-cv-03687 Melba Ortega and 2:25-cv-06368 Shaquille Maxey-Smith on one side and City of Los Angeles and County of Los Angeles on the other.
The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court issued a scheduling notice in a separate case, Shaquille Maxey-Smith v. City of Los Angeles et al, which is unrelated to Melba Ortega v. County of Los Angeles et al.
This notice is a routine procedural step to manage the case's timeline. The notice. On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court dismissed the case of Melba Ortega v. This means the lawsuit is no longer active and will not proceed. The case was dismissed without explanation.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court issued a scheduling notice in a separate case, Shaquille Maxey-Smith v. City of Los Angeles et al, which is unrelated to Melba Ortega v. County of Los Angeles et al. This notice is a routine procedural step to manage the case's timeline. The notice does not directly impact the Ortega case.
The court dismissed the case of Melba Ortega v. County of Los Angeles et al. This means the lawsuit is no longer active and will not proceed. The case was dismissed without explanation.
Text Only Scheduling Notice
Dismiss Case ( 41
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
28 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.