civil-litigation immigration federal-courts court-watch

Medina Carcamo v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Application/Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in Southern District of Florida.

26-cv-23240 S.D. Fla.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Medina Carcamo v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a civil case in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff filed an application or petition for a writ of habeas corpus under docket number 26-cv-23240. The petition challenges the legality of detention or custody.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Habeas corpus petition
  • Immigration detention
  • Civil rights
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D. Fla.

Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

0:26-cv-61388 Junior Rafael Navas Lameda v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al

Other · May 08, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 1:26-cv-23240 Medina Carcamo, 0:26-cv-61388 Junior Rafael Navas Lameda.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 20 hours ago

Medina Carcamo v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is an active civil matter in Southern District of Florida under docket 26-cv-23240.

The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-23240 Medina Carcamo on one side and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on the other. The case is currently organized around Current docket activity and next procedural step, Immigration status, removal, or agency review, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a civil case in the Southern District of Florida. The case involves a proceed in forma pauperis. The docket number is 26-cv-23240.

On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted the plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing them to proceed with their case without paying the required filing fee. This decision is significant because it enables the plaintiff to continue their lawsuit despite financial.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 8, 2026

0:26-cv-61388 Junior Rafael Navas Lameda v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al

A new habeas corpus petition was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, challenging the detention of Junior Rafael Navas Lameda by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The petition, case number 0:26-cv-61388, seeks to have Lameda released from detention. This development is relevant to the Medina Carcamo v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement case.

info
Other May 8, 2026

1:26-cv-23240 Medina Carcamo v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

The court granted the plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing them to proceed with their case without paying the required filing fee. This decision is significant because it enables the plaintiff to continue their lawsuit despite financial constraints. The plaintiff's case, Medina Carcamo v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, will now move forward.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 2 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.