SDNY Court Rules on Motion for Reconsideration
Case Summary
This case involves an order on a motion for reconsideration filed by the plaintiff in a civil matter. The order was issued by the court and is a routine procedural step in the case. The court has considered the motion and made a decision, but the details of the decision are not clear.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
12 events
Coverage
12 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Injury, negligence, and damages claims
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
- • Consumer-finance duties and borrower protections
- • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
- • Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cv-03932 Mumin v. The City of New York et al
Other · Apr 23, 2026
Coverage
12 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 6 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization
16 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes CITY OF NEW YORK, City of New York, City Of New York and others.
Press monitoring has found 12 related articles from 1 distinct source.
The Story So Far
Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al is a active matter in Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-07968. The available record does not yet identify an assigned judge.
This case involves an order on a motion for reconsideration filed by the plaintiff in a civil matter. The order was issued by the court and is a routine procedural step in the case. The court has considered the motion and made a decision, but the details of the decision are not clear.
On April 23, 2026, other: The City of New York has been added as a defendant in a separate lawsuit, Mumin v. The City of New York et al (1:23-cv-03932). This development suggests that the city's actions may be under scrutiny in multiple cases.
Th. On April 23, 2026, other: A Notice of Appearance was filed. On April 23, 2026, other: A new case, Wright v. City of New York et al (1:23-cv-03149), was filed in the Southern District of New York. This case is separate from Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.
The filing of this new case may impact the exi.
The next thing to watch is whether the recent docket activity leads to a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or another filing that changes the posture.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
12 events1:23-cv-03932 Mumin v. The City of New York et al
The City of New York has been added as a defendant in a separate lawsuit, Mumin v. The City of New York et al (1:23-cv-03932). This development suggests that the city's actions may be under scrutiny in multiple cases. The city's involvement in this new lawsuit may have implications for its liability and potential damages.
1:22-cv-08642 Stora v. City Of New York et al
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
1:23-cv-03149 Wright v. City of New York et al
A new case, Wright v. City of New York et al (1:23-cv-03149), was filed in the Southern District of New York. This case is separate from Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. The filing of this new case may impact the existing case or the parties involved.
1:23-cv-01261 Fleischer v. City Of New York et al.
The court issued an order.
1:25-cv-02479 Bilson v. The City of New York et al
The court issued an order.
1:26-cv-02724 Best v. City of New York et al
An Amended Complaint was filed.
1:21-cv-08529 Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. City of New York et al
The court granted an extension of time for Santander Consumer USA Inc. to file a response in the case Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. This extension allows Santander Consumer USA Inc. more time to prepare its response. The extension is significant because it may impact the overall timeline of the case.
1:22-cv-01904 Samuels v. City of New York et al.
A Motion was filed.
1:21-cv-03908 Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC v. City of New York et al
The City of New York has been granted an extension of time to respond to a lawsuit filed by Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC. This means the city now has more time to prepare its defense. The extension is likely a strategic move to allow the city to gather more information or consult with its lawyers.
1:23-cv-00856 VW Credit Leasing, Ltd. v. The City of New York et al
The court granted an extension of time for VW Credit Leasing, Ltd. to file a response in the case Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. This extension allows VW Credit Leasing, Ltd. more time to prepare its response. The extension is significant because it gives VW Credit Leasing, Ltd. more time to address the claims made in the case.
1:22-cv-02310 VW Credit, Inc. v. The City of New York et al
The court granted an extension of time for VW Credit, Inc. to file a response in the case Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. This extension allows VW Credit, Inc. more time to prepare its response. The extension is significant because it gives VW Credit, Inc. more time to address the claims made in the case.
1:25-cv-07968 Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
A Motion for Reconsideration was filed.
Press Coverage
1:22-cv-08642 Stora v. City Of New York et al
Notice of Appearance ( 122
1:23-cv-01261 Fleischer v. City Of New York et al.
Scheduling Order ( 105
1:25-cv-02479 Bilson v. The City of New York et al
Scheduling Order ( 31
1:21-cv-08529 Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. City of New York et al
Extension of Time ( 94
1:22-cv-01904 Samuels v. City of New York et al.
Declaration in Support of Motion ( 151
1:21-cv-03908 Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC v. City of New York et al
Extension of Time ( 124
1:23-cv-00856 VW Credit Leasing, Ltd. v. The City of New York et al
Extension of Time ( 71
1:22-cv-02310 VW Credit, Inc. v. The City of New York et al
Extension of Time ( 94
1:25-cv-07968 Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
Order on Motion for Reconsideration
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 12 articles
Timeline events
12 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 7 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.