civil-litigation consumer-finance tort government-litigation federal-courts court-watch

SDNY Court Rules on Motion for Reconsideration

25-cv-07968 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This case involves an order on a motion for reconsideration filed by the plaintiff in a civil matter. The order was issued by the court and is a routine procedural step in the case. The court has considered the motion and made a decision, but the details of the decision are not clear.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

12 events

Coverage

12 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Injury, negligence, and damages claims
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Consumer-finance duties and borrower protections
  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:23-cv-03932 Mumin v. The City of New York et al

Other · Apr 23, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

12 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

3 Defendants, 6 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization

16 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes CITY OF NEW YORK, City of New York, City Of New York and others.

Press monitoring has found 12 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 22 hours ago

Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al is a active matter in Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-07968. The available record does not yet identify an assigned judge.

This case involves an order on a motion for reconsideration filed by the plaintiff in a civil matter. The order was issued by the court and is a routine procedural step in the case. The court has considered the motion and made a decision, but the details of the decision are not clear.

On April 23, 2026, other: The City of New York has been added as a defendant in a separate lawsuit, Mumin v. The City of New York et al (1:23-cv-03932). This development suggests that the city's actions may be under scrutiny in multiple cases.

Th. On April 23, 2026, other: A Notice of Appearance was filed. On April 23, 2026, other: A new case, Wright v. City of New York et al (1:23-cv-03149), was filed in the Southern District of New York. This case is separate from Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.

The filing of this new case may impact the exi.

The next thing to watch is whether the recent docket activity leads to a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or another filing that changes the posture.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

12 events
info
Other April 23, 2026

1:23-cv-03932 Mumin v. The City of New York et al

The City of New York has been added as a defendant in a separate lawsuit, Mumin v. The City of New York et al (1:23-cv-03932). This development suggests that the city's actions may be under scrutiny in multiple cases. The city's involvement in this new lawsuit may have implications for its liability and potential damages.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:22-cv-08642 Stora v. City Of New York et al

A Notice of Appearance was filed.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:23-cv-03149 Wright v. City of New York et al

A new case, Wright v. City of New York et al (1:23-cv-03149), was filed in the Southern District of New York. This case is separate from Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. The filing of this new case may impact the existing case or the parties involved.

gavel
Order April 23, 2026

1:23-cv-01261 Fleischer v. City Of New York et al.

The court issued an order.

gavel
Order April 23, 2026

1:25-cv-02479 Bilson v. The City of New York et al

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-02724 Best v. City of New York et al

An Amended Complaint was filed.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:21-cv-08529 Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. City of New York et al

The court granted an extension of time for Santander Consumer USA Inc. to file a response in the case Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. This extension allows Santander Consumer USA Inc. more time to prepare its response. The extension is significant because it may impact the overall timeline of the case.

edit_note
Motion April 23, 2026

1:22-cv-01904 Samuels v. City of New York et al.

A Motion was filed.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:21-cv-03908 Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC v. City of New York et al

The City of New York has been granted an extension of time to respond to a lawsuit filed by Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA, LLC. This means the city now has more time to prepare its defense. The extension is likely a strategic move to allow the city to gather more information or consult with its lawyers.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:23-cv-00856 VW Credit Leasing, Ltd. v. The City of New York et al

The court granted an extension of time for VW Credit Leasing, Ltd. to file a response in the case Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. This extension allows VW Credit Leasing, Ltd. more time to prepare its response. The extension is significant because it gives VW Credit Leasing, Ltd. more time to address the claims made in the case.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:22-cv-02310 VW Credit, Inc. v. The City of New York et al

The court granted an extension of time for VW Credit, Inc. to file a response in the case Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. This extension allows VW Credit, Inc. more time to prepare its response. The extension is significant because it gives VW Credit, Inc. more time to address the claims made in the case.

gavel
Order April 22, 2026

1:25-cv-07968 Mckinnies v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al

A Motion for Reconsideration was filed.

Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

12 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 12 articles

Timeline events

12 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 7 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.