newspaper
1:24-cv-10109 McIntosh v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al
Apr 30, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
McIntosh v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al
24-cv-10109
D. Mass.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court denied the motion to dismiss in McIntosh v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al, allowing the case to proceed. The plaintiff's allegations of negligence and failure to provide a safe environment will be heard by the court. This decision is significant because it means the defendants will have to defend themselves against the plaintiff's claims.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-10109 McIntosh v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 1:24-cv-10109 McIntosh.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
info
Other
April 30, 2026
1:24-cv-10109 McIntosh v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al
The court denied the motion to dismiss in McIntosh v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority et al, allowing the case to proceed. The plaintiff's allegations of negligence and failure to provide a safe environment will be heard by the court. This decision is significant because it means the defendants will have to defend themselves against the plaintiff's claims.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 5 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.