civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Counter Statement Filed in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. et al

22-cv-00905 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. and others, the Southern District of New York docket 22-cv-00905, a counter statement was filed responding to a Rule 56.1 statement, indicating active summary judgment briefing in a civil dispute.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Summary judgment
  • Counter statement
  • Southern District of New York
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:22-cv-00905 McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. et al

Other · May 06, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Shutterstock, Inc.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 days, 19 hours ago

Counter Statement Filed in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 22-cv-00905.

The dispute currently identifies 1:22-cv-00905 McGucken on one side and Shutterstock, Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The plaintiff in McGucken v. et al filed a counter statement to the defendant's Rule 56.1 motion, which is a request for the court to consider evidence and facts in a motion for summary judgment. This counter statement is a response to the.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 5, 2026

1:22-cv-00905 McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. et al

The plaintiff in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. et al filed a counter statement to the defendant's Rule 56.1 motion, which is a request for the court to consider evidence and facts in a motion for summary judgment. This counter statement is a response to the defendant's motion, providing additional information and arguments to support the plaintiff's position. The counter statement is a key part of the litigation process, as it allows the plaintiff to present their side of the story and challenge the defendant's claims.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 days, 19 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.