1:22-cv-00905 McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. et al
Counter Statement to Rule 56.1 ( 178
In McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. and others, the Southern District of New York docket 22-cv-00905, a counter statement was filed responding to a Rule 56.1 statement, indicating active summary judgment briefing in a civil dispute.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:22-cv-00905 McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. et al
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Shutterstock, Inc.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Counter Statement Filed in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 22-cv-00905.
The dispute currently identifies 1:22-cv-00905 McGucken on one side and Shutterstock, Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The plaintiff in McGucken v. et al filed a counter statement to the defendant's Rule 56.1 motion, which is a request for the court to consider evidence and facts in a motion for summary judgment. This counter statement is a response to the.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
The plaintiff in McGucken v. Shutterstock, Inc. et al filed a counter statement to the defendant's Rule 56.1 motion, which is a request for the court to consider evidence and facts in a motion for summary judgment. This counter statement is a response to the defendant's motion, providing additional information and arguments to support the plaintiff's position. The counter statement is a key part of the litigation process, as it allows the plaintiff to present their side of the story and challenge the defendant's claims.
Counter Statement to Rule 56.1 ( 178
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 19 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.