2:26-cv-04931 Rodriguez et al v. Hybe Co., Ltd. et al
Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) ( 1
Petitioner Matute Tapia filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the US District Court for the Central District of California, seeking to challenge their detention. The petition is a request for the court to review the lawfulness of their confinement. This filing is a critical step in the habeas corpus process.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04931 Rodriguez et al v. Hybe Co., Ltd. et al
Other · May 07, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
3 Plaintiffs
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 2:26-cv-04931 MATUTE TAPIA, 3:26-cv-04931 MATUTE TAPIA, 2:26-cv-04931 Rodriguez and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
2:26-cv-04931 Rodriguez et al v. Hybe Co., Ltd. et al.
A Notice of Judicial Preferences was filed.
Petitioner Matute Tapia filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the US District Court for the Central District of California, seeking to challenge their detention. The petition is a request for the court to review the lawfulness of their confinement. This filing is a critical step in the habeas corpus process.
Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) ( 1
Notice of Judicial Preferences
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
56 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.